User defined DTL functions



1 comment

  • Official comment
    Geir Ove Grønmo

    In general we want the pipe to be self-contained. We do not want to introduce the complexity of maintain external logic outside of the pipe itself at this time. It would require a policy for how to deal with the versioning of such a library of functions.

    In this specific it's pretty clear that we could make a change to the replace function to solve the verbosity problem, i.e. function could take a dict as an input parameter. So in general we prefer making our built-in function richer.

    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.